Home |
Garth's Gallery |
Members' Gallery |
Open Galleries |
Photo Info |
Photo Store |
Links |
![]() |
Beyond the GrabshotA Guide to Improving your Nature Photographyby Garth HagermanEquipment, p. 4 |
![]() |
|
Let's keep this section really brief. There are just too many brands, models and features to cover in great detail without this section devouring the entire book. Besides, there are always new models coming out, and my book would be out of date in a couple of months. We'll just briefly touch on a few common features, and I'll give you my invaluable and completely, utterly impartial opinion about their merits. Brand namesThere are many camera brands out there, and they all have their own cult-like followings. The weird, twisted little secret is that no company can survive long in the competitive marketplace if they produce junk. All of the major companies generally make good cameras. All of the major companies occasionally produce models that aren't so hot. If this were a simpler world, we could just say use ThisBrand Cameras; all of their models are great, all of the other cameras in the universe are junk. But it's not, and we can't. The key is finding a system and model that's well suited to your particular needs and has good availability of usefull accessories. One important consequence of your choice of camera system is that it limits your choice of lenses. You can't mount a Minolta lens on a Nikon camera, for example. In addition to lenses made by the same company as your camera, you can also choose from a wide range of third party lenses, many of which are excellent, some of which are essentially coke bottles with lens mounts attached. Some third party lenses have interchangeable mounts, so you can mount the same lens on different camera brands. Important featuresIn order to make sense of the jumble of brands and models, we need to know which of the myriad camera features are important for nature photography, which we can live without, and which are pretty much worthless. Let's start with a list of important features which are often left off of today's hyper-technological cameras. A good camera for nature photography should have:
Dubious featuresThere are lots and lots of bells and whistles on many camera models. Many of these features have little or no value for nature photography, but some may be useful sometimes, or may be valuable for other types of shooting. Let's look at some features you can probably live without:
OK, that's just about enough stuff on the topic of cameras. Well, maybe a quick summary... try to find a camera model that has the features you need without many gratuitous bells and whistles. Make sure it is supported with a good variety of lenses and other accessories; can you get a macro lens for it? Consider the weight of the camera, since you're going to be carrying it around a lot. Consider the reputation of the model and the manufacturer, but don't let one or two anecdotes overwhelm all other criteria, and don't get sucked into a camera brand cult. Flash units and miscellaneous thingiesThere are lots of accessories which I haven't covered, but most of them can be skipped without too many horrific consequences. You might want to get a bubble level which slides onto the flash shoe on your camera; it will help minimize wide angle weirdness and keep horizon lines level. A cable release, a device that connects to your shutter button and allows you to fire the shutter from a distance, can help reduce vibration on long exposures, yielding sharper images. But the major category of accessories which I've mostly neglected is the flash unit. There's a reason I've mostly neglected flashes: I don't use them much for nature photography. The main time I do use a flash is for macro photography; I've got a small flash with a cord that enables me to direct the light where I want it. Still, it requires special circumstances for a flash to be necessary; usually it's a flower cluster on top of a tall stalk swaying in a persistent wind. In such circumstances natural light doesn't quite work; if I stop down, the motion of the flowers in the breeze blurs the image, if I open the aperture, I don't get adequate depth of field. When you use a flash for macro photos, you generally wind up with a black background, since the light from the flash doesn't reach very far into the distance. Sometimes this is kinda cool; it certainly helps focus your audience's attention on the primary subject. I still prefer to use available light wherever possible, since the black background doesn't look natural. Another big group of accessories I've neglected is camera bags. The reason I've neglected them is pretty simple: I don't have much to say about them. You'll obviously need something to carry your camera, film, and whatever other doo-dads you use into the field. Your bag needs to be padded, to protect your expensive goodies from the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune, and it needs to be water resistant, since good shooting days frequently have showers. It also needs to be big enough to hold what you need, but not so big that you feel obligated to fill it with stuff that you don't need, can't afford and is too heavy to schlepp around. And furthermore, the bag needs to be comfortable to carry; you'll be carrying it for great distances, over mountains, across rivers, through jungles, etc. A well stocked camera store will have about a bazillion bags from which to choose. |